Forum Home
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular

    [Dev] NeoScrypt GPU Miner - Public Beta Test

    Technical Development
    52
    802
    574260
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • T
      tmuir12 Regular Member last edited by

      I thought that AMD drivers 14.x had issues working with cgminer and you shouldn’t go higher than 13.12

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • R
        rob_1990 last edited by

        Can anyone tell me their optimum settings for R9-290?

        I keep getting ‘Share is above target’

        getting about 53Kh/s but 30-40% rejected. I have tried adjusting intensity etc but still seem to get the above no matter what i try. I am using 3.7.7b and AMD 13.12 Windows 7 x64

        Cheers

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • E
          estah last edited by

          HD6670 seems to have just 1Khs… what ._.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            slowhash Regular Member last edited by

            I’m also looking for optimum settings for the 290/290x gpu’s. (maybe a google doc spreadsheet with settings can be developed sort of like the litecoin one?)

            Anyway, I’m currently running -I 14 -g 4 -w 32, and have one 290 GPU running 60 kh/s and an identical GPU running 51 kh/s. win7x64, ATI 13.25, 3.7.7b.

            Tried another setting shown in this thread

            -I 13 -g 3 --thread-concurrency 11264 -w 48 -s 15 -Q 3 -E 60 --auto-gpu --gpu-powertune 20 --gpu-engine 900-1000,1050 --gpu-memdiff 325,300 --temp-target 80,95 --temp-overheat 90,105 --temp-cutoff 95,115

            but the 3.7.7b doesnt like the concurrency, and without it, only managed about 45 kh/s.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E
              estah last edited by

              I’m also looking for optimum settings for the 290/290x gpu’s. (maybe a google doc spreadsheet with settings can be developed sort of like the litecoin one?)

              Im looking for a working config :\ my GPU (HD6670) gets outmined by just 1core of my core2Quad Q6600

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                slowhash Regular Member last edited by

                Definitely need to adjust settings… Where are you starting at?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ghostlander
                  ghostlander Regular Member last edited by

                  Im looking for a working config :\ my GPU (HD6670) gets outmined by just 1core of my core2Quad Q6600

                  If your card is older than HD7000 series, don’t bother now. The kernel isn’t vectorised properly for the older cards. I have explained it on the previous page.

                  https://forum.feathercoin.com/index.php?/topic/7780-neoscrypt-gpu-miner-public-beta-test/page-13#entry68423

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E
                    Edosterman last edited by

                    @mirrax

                    You are missing OpenCL libraries. If you have them installed correctly - it will say OpenCL found and then follow the rest of the instructions.

                    I found these instructions somewhere and fine-tuned them.

                    Try this - version numbers may have changed.

                    1) AMD app sdk:

                    http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/opencl-zone/amd-accelerated-parallel-processing-app-sdk/

                    1. cd ~/Downloads/
                    2. mkdir amd_sdk
                    3. mv AMD-APP-SDK-v2.9-lnx64.tgz amd_sdk
                    4. cd amd_sdk
                    5. tar zxvf AMD-APP-SDK-v2.9-lnx64.tgz
                    6. sudo ./Install-AMD-APP.sh

                    The installer for the APP_SDK seems to break some files, or at least it did during testing. Do the following to fix it:

                    cd /etc/OpenCL/vendors/

                    in here are two files amdocl32.icd and amdocl64.icd, you will find their contents (they are just text files) to be “libamdocl32.so” and “libamdocl64.so” respectively.

                    Edit them to include their full paths, so the contents of

                    amdocl32.icd --> “/usr/lib32/fglrx/libamdocl32.so”

                    amdocl64.icd --> “/usr/lib/fglrx/libamdocl64.so”.

                    NOTE: A user building on Xubuntu 13.10 reported his libamdocl32.so and libamdocl64.so libraries being at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libamdocl32.so and /usr/lib/libamdocl64.so respectively.

                    2) ADL SDK

                    http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/graphics-development/display-library-adl-sdk/

                    In this example, my source code is in ~/Miners/cgminer

                    1. cd ~/Downloads/
                    2. mkdir adl
                    3. mv ADL_SDK_6.0.zip adl
                    4. cd adl
                    5. unzip ADL_SDK_6.0.zip
                    6. cd include
                    7. cp * ~/Miners/cgminer/ADL_SDK
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • E
                      Edosterman last edited by

                      @slowhash

                      I read somewhere that thread-concurrency has no bearing in neo-scrypt

                      I have compiled 3.7.7b under Ubuntu.

                      I have not managed to get it to run for more than 24 hours at a time.

                      Lots of restarts between accepts - i am running this against a p2p pool for PXC.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • R
                        raintowers last edited by

                        @slowhash

                        I read somewhere that thread-concurrency has no bearing in neo-scrypt

                        I have compiled 3.7.7b under Ubuntu.

                        I have not managed to get it to run for more than 24 hours at a time.

                        Lots of restarts between accepts - i am running this against a p2p pool for PXC.

                        I have had the same problem with all versions not running very long I’ve tried all suggestions but it still quits. Only thing that works for me is start it with the -T option and it runs and runs…

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • F
                          FeatherJunkie last edited by

                          Hi everyone! First real post here. Long time lurker, but finally got around to creating account due to NeoScrypt. So far I am very excited and think this is a great move. I do have some questions though.

                          Does anyone know if the current settings for solo mining are going to be the same once we fork? If my understanding is correct, we just need to have neoscrypt cgminer running when feathercoin forks and we should be good, right?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • T
                            tmuir12 Regular Member last edited by

                            You can solo mine with the neoscrypt cgminer, but I’ve found that you will need different setting to what you use for Scrypt mining.

                            The easiest way to try it out now is to set yourself up to attempt solo mining on Phoenix coin to work out your optimum settings and then you just need to change your solo miner setup to point back from the PXC wallet to your Feathercoin one.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • E
                              estah last edited by

                              I’m on windows8.1
                              my bat file:

                              cgminer.exe --neoscrypt -o stratum.pxc.theblocksfactory.com:3332 -u estah.2 -p x --api-listen

                              HD6670

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • E
                                einkerl last edited by

                                Imperialcoin (IPC) is making the switch to neoscrypt in 450 blocks.

                                Difficulty will be way lower than Phoenixcoin. Maybe use that one for solo mining testing.

                                My batch files

                                for p2pool mining : cgminer.exe --neoscrypt -I 14 -w 48 -g 2 -o stratum+tcp://prometheus.phoenixcoin.org:10554 -u -p x

                                gives 90 kh/s on amd 280x

                                for local mining : cgminer.exe --neoscrypt -I 13 -w 32 -g 2 -o 127.0.0.1:9554 -u -p

                                gives about 80 on the wallet

                                AMD 14.9 drivers

                                You can solo mine with the neoscrypt cgminer, but I’ve found that you will need different setting to what you use for Scrypt mining.

                                The easiest way to try it out now is to set yourself up to attempt solo mining on Phoenix coin to work out your optimum settings and then you just need to change your solo miner setup to point back from the PXC wallet to your Feathercoin one.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  slowhash Regular Member last edited by

                                  I’m on windows8.1
                                  my bat file:

                                  cgminer.exe --neoscrypt -o stratum.pxc.theblocksfactory.com:3332 -u estah.2 -p x --api-listen

                                  HD6670

                                  See this post.

                                  https://forum.feathercoin.com/index.php?/topic/7780-neoscrypt-gpu-miner-public-beta-test/?p=68572

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    slowhash Regular Member last edited by

                                    The coin that is switching is IPC, not IMP… https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=476091.0

                                    IMPerialcoin (IMP) is making the switch to neoscrypt in 450 blocks.

                                    Difficulty will be way lower than Phoenixcoin. Maybe use that one for solo mining testing.

                                    My batch files

                                    for p2pool mining : cgminer.exe --neoscrypt -I 14 -w 48 -g 2 -o stratum+tcp://prometheus.phoenixcoin.org:10554 -u -p x

                                    gives 90 kh/s on amd 280x

                                    for local mining : cgminer.exe --neoscrypt -I 13 -w 32 -g 2 -o 127.0.0.1:9554 -u -p

                                    gives about 80 on the wallet

                                    AMD 14.9 drivers

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • E
                                      einkerl last edited by

                                      The coin that is switching is IPC, not IMP… https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=476091.0

                                      Aargh, typo. edited original post

                                      Thanks for correcting me :)

                                      about 250 blocks left before the switch

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        slowhash Regular Member last edited by

                                        Aargh, typo. edited original post

                                        Thanks for correcting me :)

                                        about 250 blocks left before the switch

                                        I just didn’t want people looking for the wrong Imperial coin to experiment with, like I did… :)

                                        Lol, who in their right mind would start a coin with an existing name but use different letters? Wow, thought much not used by IMP devs!!

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • E
                                          estah last edited by

                                          If your card is older than HD7000 series, don’t bother now. The kernel isn’t vectorised properly for the older cards. I have explained it on the previous page.

                                          https://forum.feathercoin.com/index.php?/topic/7780-neoscrypt-gpu-miner-public-beta-test/page-13#entry68423

                                          See this post.

                                          https://forum.feathercoin.com/index.php?/topic/7780-neoscrypt-gpu-miner-public-beta-test/?p=68572

                                          Please vectorise the HD6000 series… I want to mine PXC :c

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • R
                                            raintowers last edited by

                                            Update!

                                            Well I love following this thread. I get all kinds of hints related to what I’m interested in.

                                            The post about IPC starting after 66000 was cool because I figured out after a lot of googleing + stray posts to get the IPC client to solo mine.

                                            I started on the PXC and got some blocks solo mining too. But now back to the blocks factory.

                                            Now I’m waiting for feathercoin to arrive around the 24th.

                                            At this point I’ve got minerd running with my i7 2600k slightly over’d getting 26.3K

                                            My cgminer is running a hd 7750 3gb at 13 K with the -T option because what has come so far doesn’t last the 24 hr test

                                            Best regards,

                                            Raintowers

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post