[Dev] NeoScrypt Hardware Comparison Site
-
############### Update News ###############
The “New Submission” page on the site is now working!
You can find it at: http://hw.neoscrypt.tk/new/
Please use that instead of posting submissions here!!!
############### Thanks ###############
Sydney
-
Spartan, this is awesome! Thank you ahy!
-
I’ll pin this in dev for you if that’s ok.
-
Hi all
Proof of my Submission for “Sapphire HD 6570” at http://hw.neoscrypt.tk/new/
proof:https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/53187180/Proof-GPU_HD6570.jpg
“Sapphire HD 6570 OC to HD6670”
proof: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/53187180/Proof-GPU_HD6570_OC_HD6670.jpg
-
Hi all
Proof of my Submission for “Sapphire HD 6570” at http://hw.neoscrypt.tk/new/
proof:https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/53187180/Proof-GPU_HD6570.jpg
You are using the wrong tool to show proof. You are using the GPU Caps Viewer, instead of GPU-Z as requested. GPU-Z shows more info, including the ability to read the sensors on your card.
-
My additions to the neo site comparison. (data already entered on ‘new’ page)
pic 1 shows the reported hashrates (I get these before running GPU-z)
pic 2 shows lowered hashrates after running GPU-z and it slows down my hashrate until rebooting!!!
pic 3 shows GPU 1 & 2 -XFX R9 290x settings
pic 4 shows GPU 3 & 4 -Sapphire TRi-x OC R9 290 settings
-
Spartan, this is awesome! Thank you ahy!
Thanks, i’m enjoying making it too, learning php and html as i go along :D
I’ll pin this in dev for you if that’s ok.
That’s awesome thanks!
Hi all
Proof of my Submission for “Sapphire HD 6570” at http://hw.neoscrypt.tk/new/
proof:https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/53187180/Proof-GPU_HD6570.jpg
I’ve accepted your submission on the site, in future try to use GPU-z for proof, as it gives more information :)
You are using the wrong tool to show proof. You are using the GPU Caps Viewer, instead of GPU-Z as requested. GPU-Z shows more info, including the ability to read the sensors on your card.
It’s not too critical now the new submissions page is working, as i can pull most information of other sources (bandwidth/power etc) but it’s easier if people can fill it out themselves (GPU-z gives all the information needed for the fields on the submission page)
For proof all that is needed now is a screenshot of the card name and clockrates, alongwith the miner software showing the hashrate. and please put a link to that in the “notes” section in the submission.
My additions to the neo site comparison. (data already entered on ‘new’ page)
pic 1 shows the reported hashrates (I get these before running GPU-z)
pic 2 shows lowered hashrates after running GPU-z and it slows down my hashrate until rebooting!!!
pic 3 shows GPU 1 & 2 -XFX R9 290x settings
pic 4 shows GPU 3 & 4 -Sapphire TRi-x OC R9 290 settings
Added those now, is the 290 beating the 290x because of the memory type? seems pretty interesting to see how different memory types can effect things alot, perhaps timings have something to do with it.
############### Important ###############
For proof, please upload your screenshot to any free image hosting site, e.g. http://tinypic.com/ or screenshot sharing site e.g. http://gyazo.com
AND
put this link in the ‘Notes’ section when entering your submission on the new submissions page.
This makes it a whole lot easier to find where peoples proof images are! (i have to check this thread to make sure i havent missed any)
Also: html code can be used in the notes section, to add a link to proof:
[Proof][4]Again can i remind everyone the new submission page is working, and can be found at http://hw.neoscrypt.tk/new/
############### Thanks ###############
Sydney
-
You are using the wrong tool to show proof. You are using the GPU Caps Viewer, instead of GPU-Z as requested. GPU-Z shows more info, including the ability to read the sensors on your card.
ok i’ll use it now
thank’s
-
Added those now, is the 290 beating the 290x because of the memory type? seems pretty interesting to see how different memory types can effect things alot, perhaps timings have something to do with it.
That is correct, they are both bottlenecked by using wolf’s next oldest kernel because I cannot get the latest one running, but the Hynix vs Elpida memory thing is the single factor in the difference in speed, as they are both using settings very close to each other to get those speeds. Which is why I included the memory type.
When the newest kernel is released in a working windows build, those will have to be edited as they should both see a minimum15% increase in speed. 8)
-
Elpida memory must be pretty bad to be that much slower wow xD
Both my 660ti and 770 have hynix, and ive noticed that the memory clock has the biggest effect on hashrate, pulling my 660ti from 1175 core to 1333 barely sped it up by 1kh/s, but pushing the ram from 1503 to 1775 made it shoot up by about 4-5kh/s
Now to see what i can get outa my asus 770 (still waiting for the rest of my watercooling setup so i can swap out my 660ti)
Could probably try overclocking my i7 more and testing out how fast i can get that going on all 8 threads, and give the 660ti a rest (poor things being hammering away for the past 2 weeks straight lol)… i can get this i7 stable at 5ghz (im a lucky ducky) but it does require a lot of overvolting and a lot of cooling, hopefully watercooling will remedy that (as i said still waiting for some parts)
Note: has noone got AMD cpus? Could do with some of those being submitted to the site! That E1-1200 is sitting there all on its own… lonely thing :p
-
My mining rig has an AMD 8350 CPU, but that’s currently (and always) occupied by mining 4 GPU’s and 6 ASIC devices…
And the Intel Q9600 in this workstation is busy running a browser and wallets and emails… And really pushing this box at all tends to display this funny blue screen with white lettering that basically says “ha ha, I’m going to reboot now, so screw whatever you were doing” so I tend not to push it a lot…
I did at one time mine a couple cores of each of those on neoscrypt, here is the results:
-AMD 8350 (8 core) black running stock clock gets 1.63 kh/s per core.
-Intel Q9660 (quad core) unlocked running stock clock gets 1.32 kh/s per core.-ramping up to 3/4 the cores in both CPU’s held the per-core hashrate shown
The wife is due for a PC upgrade, an AMD APU might be going in there. :)
-
My mining rig has an AMD 8350 CPU, but that’s currently (and always) occupied by mining 4 GPU’s and 6 ASIC devices…
And the Intel Q9600 in this workstation is busy running a browser and wallets and emails… And really pushing this box at all tends to display this funny blue screen with white lettering that basically says “ha ha, I’m going to reboot now, so screw whatever you were doing” so I tend not to push it a lot…
I did at one time mine a couple cores of each of those on neoscrypt, here is the results:
-AMD 8350 (8 core) black running stock clock gets 1.63 kh/s per core.
-Intel Q9660 (quad core) unlocked running stock clock gets 1.32 kh/s per core.-ramping up to 3/4 the cores in both CPU’s held the per-core hashrate shown
The wife is due for a PC upgrade, an AMD APU might be going in there. :)
for an AMD apu i’d reccomend the A10-7850K, that thing is pretty impressive! and plenty of ram really lets it fly, my friend recently got one in his machine, he can even run some games at 1080p at mid-high settings!
thanks for giving me some info for CPUs :P however the comparison site also needs memory amount/type/channel/speed, so if you could get those that would be great!
if you could submit the details on the site, would be even more awesome :D
-
############### Update ###############
ACP login page complete, and actually works! (after 6 hours straight sat at my laptop)
Logging out also works!
It’s as secure as i can make it right now (no plaintext passwords are used huehue), with session id which is checked based on ip when navigating to any page on the ACP, i will look into making sessions time limited aswell (more security… hehe).
############### Thanks ###############
Sydney
-
GPU - Intel
lol, get rid of this :)
Site is looking good, better with every entry
-
GPU - Intel
lol, get rid of this :)Site is looking good, better with every entry
Haha, yeah, i was maybe hoping people would test out the onboard hd2500/4000 chips and above, my i7’s hd4000 gets 18mh/s for sha256, was wondering what it would manage for neoscrypt :P ill try give mine a run today, but if its that crappy ill just remove them all together :P
-
GPU - Intel
lol, get rid of this :)
Site is looking good, better with every entry
adding my i7’s HD 4000!
manages 8.1kh/s at just 11.7w! (1150mhz) not bad for a little intel chip!
might even try overclocking it to the sky… let’s see how fast it can go (i recon 1700mhz is possible on this thing hehe)
EDIT: 10.3kh/s at 15.7w (1500mhz) … losing a bit of efficiency, but let’s try for that 1700… hehe
EDIT 2: 11.68kh/s at 17.3w (1700mhz) … pushing any higher runs into endless hardware errors, and i dont wanna push more voltage into it as its already at +0.3v and i dont wanna kill it lol, if i can run it alongside my cpu and 660Ti, then ill be hitting around 69 kh/s (lol)
EDIT 3: just realised it’s actually pretty efficient (around 650h/w) compared to most GPUs in the table (bar the 280x/290/290x), which is actually rather impressive for an intel GPU!
-
Page not found (404) on the main link and the ‘acp’ link.
‘New’ link times out.
-
Works fine for me last i checked, let me see
Edit: still works fine for me, if you’re on windows, open cmd and enter “ipconfig/flushdns” (without quote marks), that should fix it. I moved the box that its hosted on so the dns may not have refreshed yet
-
It’s working for me now as well, without the flush.
Fun times tomorrow, 3 of the GPU’s in the test results are coming out to get RMA’d… The 2 Sapphire 290’s for fan failures, and one of the XFX just got sick and died with no warning whatever. SGminer showed card as sick, then went to dead. Restarted SG, and the computer locked up hard. On reboot, card not detected.
That gives me an HIS 280x to try to outrun my XFX 290x POS…
-
Well, success!! (of a sort)
I managed to get the HIS 280x (GPU 0) to hash faster (303 khs) than I’ve been able to get the XFX 290x to hash reliably (GPU 1 & 2 @ 301 khs)…
When I get the 280x to max speed, I’ll upload the stats and proof to the site, but there never be another XFX GPU in my future.
– edit – up to 307k
