Forum Home
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular

    [Dev] NeoScrypt GPU Miner - Public Beta Test

    Technical Development
    52
    802
    574770
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • V
      vehre last edited by

      Ups, only read the last two messages here after merging Wolf0’s kernel into the master-branch. So master-github is now on 3.7.8 including wolf’s current kernel.

      I have tested it on an Nvidia GPU and had no issues, but running only for short periods of time. Let’s monitor that.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        cisahasa last edited by

        i have 14.9 drivers, version 14.301.1001.0

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • W
          Wolf0 Regular Member last edited by

          i have 14.9 drivers, version 14.301.1001.0

          All right; give it another go and I’ll leave mine going.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            cisahasa last edited by

            i think 14.9 doesnt like my high gpu clocks…

            yes, seems it was my only elpida card crashed

            so i think this is more related to elpida card on 14.9 than this new kernel( of course elpida will be pushed harder with new kernel with 14.9)

            i dropped clocks by 10mhz for now

            added 2>logfile.txt to my conf, is it good to log all needed?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R
              RIPPEDDRAGON Regular Member last edited by

              Can we get a windows compile of the updated miner from Wolf0

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ChekaZ
                ChekaZ last edited by

                Can we get a windows compile of the updated miner from Wolf0

                • would also like to have one.

                BTC: 1Ges1taJ69W7eEMbQLcmNGnUZenBkCnn45
                FTC: 6sxjM96KMZ7t4AmDTUKDZdq82Nj931VQvY

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • R
                  rynomite last edited by

                  https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0

                  Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.

                  Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • W
                    Wolf0 Regular Member last edited by

                    https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0

                    Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.

                    Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.

                    Oddly, even on my own in-dev kernel, my 290X at 1125/1600 (memory type unknown) does 250kh/s, while my Hynix 280X does 255kh/s - 265kh/s at 1150/1500… weird.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R
                      rynomite last edited by

                      Wow, 255Kh/s with no HW errors? I’m assuming that’s 1 gpu… None of my stuff is OC’d except for my 7950’s (which went from 85kh/s to 113kh/s) …

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ChekaZ
                        ChekaZ last edited by

                        https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0

                        Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.

                        Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.

                        Awesome thanks, up to 150kh/s now on R9 280x.

                        BTC: 1Ges1taJ69W7eEMbQLcmNGnUZenBkCnn45
                        FTC: 6sxjM96KMZ7t4AmDTUKDZdq82Nj931VQvY

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • W
                          Wolf0 Regular Member last edited by

                          Wow, 255Kh/s with no HW errors? I’m assuming that’s 1 gpu… None of my stuff is OC’d except for my 7950’s (which went from 85kh/s to 113kh/s) …

                          Yes, it’s one card; it wouldn’t be worth mentioning if it had HW errors, lol.

                          On my in-dev kernel, I have a 7950 at 1175/1600 and solidly over 210kh/s.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • R
                            RIPPEDDRAGON Regular Member last edited by

                            Yes, it’s one card; it wouldn’t be worth mentioning if it had HW errors, lol.

                            On my in-dev kernel, I have a 7950 at 1175/1600 and solidly over 210kh/s.

                            Weird I cant seem to replicate at all, 140 max on 280x and 160 on 290

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • R
                              rynomite last edited by

                              So how do we get a copy of this in-dev kernel? LoL

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • W
                                Wolf0 Regular Member last edited by

                                Weird I cant seem to replicate at all, 140 max on 280x and 160 on 290

                                Yes, I know you can’t - because it’s a half-rewritten kernel that I’m using. Not the 14.9 fixed one.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • R
                                  rynomite last edited by

                                  So, some new observations… My initial results with 3.7.8 were based on using the exact same settings I had used with the 3.7.7 series. Try starting over with your configs (ie: bump up -w, change intensity etc). My 7950 rig got even more performance with -w 64 and a higher intensity, which it couldn’t do with the 13.x bin files… I’ll keep playing.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • W
                                    Wolf0 Regular Member last edited by

                                    So, some new observations… My initial results with 3.7.8 were based on using the exact same settings I had used with the 3.7.7 series. Try starting over with your configs (ie: bump up -w, change intensity etc). My 7950 rig got even more performance with -w 64 and a higher intensity, which it couldn’t do with the 13.x bin files… I’ll keep playing.

                                    Want my settings for different cards?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • R
                                      rynomite last edited by

                                      Absolutely… :) I’m getting pretty decent performance bumps from my 7950’s by tweaking the settings, but my 290’s aren’t doing much better than they already were.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • W
                                        Wolf0 Regular Member last edited by

                                        Just in case some of you haven’t seen them before, my screenshots are NSFW.

                                        My mixed card rig, Freya, with card types and settings shown (you won’t get the same hash, but the settings should work well): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/neoscryptwolf-11022014-2.png

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          slowhash Regular Member last edited by

                                          Just in case some of you haven’t seen them before, my screenshots are NSFW.

                                          My mixed card rig, Freya, with card types and settings shown (you won’t get the same hash, but the settings should work well): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/neoscryptwolf-11022014-2.png

                                          Looks pretty uncluttered, except for those “want” icons… ;)

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • A
                                            Alpha Wolf last edited by

                                            https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0

                                            Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.

                                            Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.

                                            Tested this with Nvidia 560m I’m see no improvement, actually I’m seeing a 1.02kh/s loss using 3.7.8

                                            used same command line as I was with 3.7.7c, still testing will try new settings next.

                                            –neoscrypt --no-submit-stale -s 1 --expiry 1 --queue 0 -I 10 -w 32

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post