A Possible Future with DPoS, etc.
-
Kevlar, any pointers on generalizing the cryptocoin format so
1. coins can be libraries
2. wallets can be scriptable themes
would be welcome.
My health is a little better and I am getting back in this thing. I think what happened to us in the before times rattled me a bit.
As for slack, I tried maintaining the #feathercoin channel on freenode, but web is taking over everything, because well installing and configuring stuff is getting worse.
Cue Hitler finds out video…
Well I’m a contibutor on Bitcore so I’m super biased. But in my opinion it’s the best of the best in terms of a crypto-currency package-as-a-library. http://bitcore.io/
Of course BitcoinJ is also very popular, but there’s definately some features that are not entirely desierable.
As for wallets being ‘scriptable themes’, I have no idea what that means. Do you want to restyle an existing QT or web wallet? If so, you just modify the UI meta-data XML and C++, or HTML/CSS. Or do you want to script actions against a wallet? I’m not sure what a ‘scriptable theme’ is.
Also, do you think we can keep this discussion on topic? It’s supposed to be about the future of Feathercoin… We have a technical discussion board for such things.
-
So, I can’t believe I’m still doing this, but does anyone actually have any questions about DPoS, ICO’s, PoB and how, if done correctly, this combination could save Feathercoin.
-
so you just haven’t been attacking ftc and its dev for the longest time but come in as a saviour when it suits your own ends…hmmm sure…dude it is what it is and people who can read can see that for themselves.
so for just one example of you being a bad actor elsewhere in the crypto community; so you didn’t plan to DDOS multipools, and then start a smear campaign against a multipool operator while part of the DGC community?
+1 kelsey
-
So, I can’t believe I’m still doing this, but does anyone actually have any questions about DPoS, ICO’s, PoB and how, if done correctly, this combination could save Feathercoin.
I do.
I want to see all information Kevlar is hiding from me.
Complete plan.
Thank you.
-
Kevlar and Mirrax. Drop it. Go start your own thread attacking each other if you want, but leave it out.
It’s off topic and clutters the thread. Take your quarrels elsewhere.
-
Questions anyone?
-
Questions anyone?
I have a question.
Can you show me complete plan of what why and how you plan to do?
-
+1 kelsey
What [removed profanity] you +1’ing him for? Telling lies?
-
I have a question.
Can you show me complete plan of what why and how you plan to do?
No, Mirrax, we’re here answering questions about DPoS, ICO’s, PoB and how, if done correctly, this combination could save Feathercoin.
Please, try and keep the conversation on topic. You’ve done enough trolling to last us a lifetime.
-
I think he was talking about my plan for ftc if people want it
-
I’ll rewrite it more clearly in the OP here.
-
also, language people…
Cant you start another thread? I could do it, Kevlar vs The World where anyone can free form argue with no holds bar in language.
-
I’ll rewrite it more clearly in the OP here.
That would be great Calem. Thank you.
-
-
This chain will be born into existence via a BTC PoB ICO with sharedropping to the ftc and bts communities.
If you’re doing a BTC PoB, then the shares go to the BTC holders, not the FTC holders.
Are you suggesting that simply by being a member of this forum, a portion of the voting rights should be given to you free of charge? That is a sure-fire way to destroy any investor value, and it incentivizes the wrong people for the wrong reasons.
As a developer who is potentially working on this, there’s no way you’re going to convince me that someone who has done nothing but cause problems should be automatically rewarded for my efforts and contributions, let alone in equal amounts compared to those who are actually contributing by writing code. Then this just turns the ICO into a popularity contest and we can all get real shitty at each other about who should get more shares.
No to sharedropping on arbitrary token holders. It destroys economic investment incentive, developer incentive, and falls completely out of line with the entire ethos of DPoS and Open Source development and the goals of the ICO itself.
-
I’m revising my idea to my original one
in the process of editing the OP
-
updated.
-
updated.
I just read it.
Seriously?
After half year of work you came up with this? -
I see that we’ve revised it from a BTC PoB to a FTC PoB. Which is fine if you don’t care about your economic valuation and you are good with a worthless token on day 1. Then FTC can have it’s own little playground of a blockchain where they can continue to vote for who should get more tokens. Good luck filling up your round.
Or, you could stick with the initial reasoning behind an ICO, which is to create economic value. In your list of reasons you said that this was a solution for funding, but you’re using PoB, so no one gets the funds.
I would suggest you need to pick two of the three, because you can’t get all three:
You can have a PoB and economic value, but not FTC sharedropping.
You can have ICO and funding, but not FTC sharedropping.
Or, you can have FTC share dropping and PoB, but not economic valuation and investor potential.
-
I just read it.
Seriously?
After half year of work you came up with this?Can we just ban him from this topic please?
As usual everyone wants to discuss solutions, and Mirrax wants to troll…