A Possible Future with DPoS, etc.
-
This is no coincidence… I didn’t stick around to help lead the coin to a half baked idea.
It was the best idea at the start of the year, and it still is. I’ve done my best to find more acceptable alternatives but none have been reached.
You can’t take all the credit. ;)
-
thanks for the explanations, and all the best for this project,
-
thanks for the explanations, and all the best for this project,
And thank you for setting the example for the rest of the community and not pitchforking us.
-
This is no coincidence… I didn’t stick around to help lead the coin to a half baked idea.
It was the best idea at the start of the year, and it still is. I’ve done my best to find more acceptable alternatives but none have been reached.
You can’t take all the credit. ;)
I wouldn’t think to! It has been a joint venture of a Bill and Ted scale.
Wayne and Garth?
Bert and Ernie?
Mike Lowrey and Marcus Burnette! There we go.
-
We know it is possible and perfectly viable. But with that said. Kevlar and I are just messengers. We can not help make this happen.
It is not something we want to do or are willing to do.
I’m willing to come back and help coordinate if asked and if there’s funding with a dpos structure for the team.
But let this be clear, this isn’t our project. This is for who ever is willing to write the code.
As repeated again and again, we are just sharing information we have gathered.
-
@Kevlar XD lol?!
-
i am lost in between the fight you are having and trying to understand
what are the changes you want to make to FTC
try to stop the figthing and construct find a consensus if you beleive in FTC
and after explain it to the rest of us if you consider the
community as an important part of the process
I also request explanation and proper plan. Nothing more nothing less.
-
I also request explanation and proper plan. Nothing more nothing less.
Yes, we’ve given you tons of explanations. There is no ‘plan’ for FTC.
Why do you keep insisting we have one? We have a plan, and it has nothing to do with FTC, and you can’t have it. So please, stop asking for it.
-
well that what they are trying to do and it would be better if we all add constructive
feed back to the discussion so it evolve
-
This talk looks more healthy!
-
well that what they are trying to do and it would be better if we all add constructive
feed back to the discussion so it evolveExactly. There isn’t a finished plan, just a big block of possibilities which can be honed into the correct network for the future. Nothing is sacred.
-
I’ll tell you what I don’t want us to do though, stifle the future for the benefit of a privileged few.
The belief otherwise is why Mirrax has been throwing his toys out of the pram.
-
I also request explanation and proper plan. Nothing more nothing less.
Mirrax, please go back and actually read what has been said so far.
Let’s be VERY CLEAR about this. We don’t want to make any changes to FTC.
Ok? Everyone got that? Can we never say that again please? Thanks.
There is no plan. Please stop with the trolling.
-
Ya got the wrong guy, Kelsey.
are you “kenel” from DGC?
-
No he isn’t. I have kennel on skype and he and kevlar and I spoke with each other about what feathercoin and digitalcoin should do.
-
are you “kenel” from DGC?
No, that’s Brian. My name is Travis.
-
No, that’s Brian. My name is Travis.
someone told me you where also kenel from dgc, so you are atleast “Kevlar-FTC” from dgc but not kenel?
-
that person was wrong
-
Kennel on dgc is brian. Kevlar is travis.
-
someone told me you where also kenel from dgc, so you are atleast “Kevlar-FTC” from dgc but not kenel?
Yep. I regularly talk to kenel on Skype. But I am definitely not him.
Not to mention I’m a lot better looking than him too…
You do know kenel can’t code, right? Where as I am a well established software developer with a lot of technologies I’ve invented that target cryptocurrencies. My credentials are definitely well established here.
