Feathercoin Core 0.11.1.1 Launch
-
@aciddude
ok, then I leave it to @lizhi , who is running the windows version. As I only run on Linux, I can’t help here, I’m afraid
-
At first start 0.11.1 ,you need to download the full blockchain again . because 0.11.1 run block version 3 ,not version 2. It is a different format to store blockchain information.
-
Some how it started working as normal.
Steps:
1 - backup all your wallets, private keys etc
2 - remove any Feathercoin Directory in %AppData%
3 - Downloaded and installed this build of FTC Core 0.11.1 from Lizhi http://www.ftc-c.com/pack4/feathercoin-setup.exe
4 - Synced FTC block chain in record time!
5 - all working as normal! I was able to close FTC core, open again with no problems. restarting the machine and then opening FTC core was also fine.
6 - Profit ?–
Either the build I had of FTC core was poo poo (I cant remember where I got it…) or there’s something wrong with my machine…I have RAID SSDs and one of them is about to die…but I doubt that could cause this…how much CPU is FTC core 0.11.1.1 supposed to be using on average ? after a full blockchain sync ?
-
i reverted back to an older client, no choice new one just won’t cooperate.
-
@kelsey what exactly you mean by that?
-
-
@kelsey - did you try the steps I mentioned above including downloading the the build from Lizhi ?
mines still working after multiple shutdowns/restarts so I’m assuming now it’s working as normal.
-
I update core to 0.11.2 , We can keep up with bitcoin.
Core 0.11.2 add BIP65, ability to implement OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY. -
@lizhi Hello Lizhi, I recieved 100k FTC from Mr. Kraken as donation for your work on Core. Please post your address. :)
-
Hi mirrax, thanks for your help, I will keep the development for Feathercoin,if you are willing to donate, my wallet is 71whQbi6pq2aCSvMvcTKCcTZDfAbUvf2Se
-
@lizhi said:
Hi mirrax, thanks for your help, I will keep the development for Feathercoin,if you are willing to donate, my wallet is 71whQbi6pq2aCSvMvcTKCcTZDfAbUvf2Se
I just sent you 100 000 FTC!
9358797413bd5a3a7e060682d82ac0c2a4f9530f5563e1c4d3a5607fd1e93996-000But I only forwarded this generous message.
You say thank you to Kraken, not me :)I love what you do with wallet, please be with us also this year, 2016!
-
We need to add some new 0.11.2 nodes.the more the better.
Now, 0.11.2 accounted for 4.3%
[all version ] (http://www.ftc-c.com/pack4/fullnode.png) -
@lizhi said:
We need to add some new 0.11.2 nodes.the more the better.
Now, 0.11.2 accounted for 4.3%
[all version ] (http://www.ftc-c.com/pack4/fullnode.png)OK, I will upgrade to 0.11.2 on windows and keep 0.9.3 on linux…
-
@lizhi said:
We need to add some new 0.11.2 nodes.the more the better.
Now, 0.11.2 accounted for 4.3%
[all version ] (http://www.ftc-c.com/pack4/fullnode.png)Why do we need them?
[Edit]
If we need the clients to test funcionality and/or features we should start the testnet again
[/EDIT] -
Just saying thanks and kudos / browny points to all helping with testing the latest versions of FTC… ;)
-
I’m just testing 0.11.2
got it compiled with far less problems than I had with 0.9.x
I just started the gui and it shows ‘MFTC’??!???
-
should that be mFTC? in settings
plus : updated source code Link at Thread header to version 0.11.2 on Github
-
@wrapper said:
should that be mFTC? in settings
plus : updated source code Link at Thread header to version 0.11.2 on Github
Will check that next time I start the gui. Currently testing the daemon
- sync is ongoing
- importing a private key for a wallet address is working
-
A comment from my side about 0.11.x:
for me both versions are currently in Beta test, as we
- don’t have pre-compiled binaries (started to work on that yesterday)
- have many references to “Bitcoin” in the help texts and some in the gui
- don’t have a clear picture (or sould I say ‘1 don’t’? ) how the bc and network behaves, if the new block version is enforced
- have no information of the status of pools, if when and how they’ll implement 0.11.2
But that is just my opinion. :D
What do others think?
-
@Wellenreiter said:
A comment from my side about 0.11.x:
for me both versions are currently in Beta test, as we
- don’t have pre-compiled binaries (started to work on that yesterday)
- have many references to “Bitcoin” in the help texts and some in the gui
- don’t have a clear picture (or sould I say ‘1 don’t’? ) how the bc and network behaves, if the new block version is enforced
- have no information of the status of pools, if when and how they’ll implement 0.11.2
But that is just my opinion. :D
What do others think?
Looks like a valid points. I think it is important to push Core 0.11.2 so more people can test and feedback.
Also I would like to see 0.9.x features migrated to 0.11.2 (Lizhi is working on migration)
