Forum Home
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular

    New Miner Needing Help with HD7870 settings on NSGminer?

    Mining
    7
    58
    49771
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • greenuser
      greenuser @greenuser last edited by

      @wrapper, I got loads of CPU and Ram free

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • wrapper
        wrapper Moderators last edited by

        You are running windows?

        greenuser 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • greenuser
          greenuser @wrapper last edited by

          @wrapper yep

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • wrapper
            wrapper Moderators last edited by wrapper

            Looks like a windows build is possible. Or try Ubuntu Bash on windows and compile it in there.

            It isn’t a simple download / release yet as far as I can see.

            I’m sure Wellenreiter could do one, when he can get time, we’re a bit over run building and test a couple of new releases.

            There are other members about that have helped with windows builds, who might see the thread and help.

            https://github.com/wellenreiter01/p2pool-neoscrypt

            The guide for virtual box is a out of date and needs some further fixes from the transfer to the ne NodeBB forum. So, I’ve done an emergency fix, but that guide needs replacing updating now…

            https://forum.feathercoin.com/topic/729/guide-setup-p2pool-for-feathercoin-in-virtualbox

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • wrapper
              wrapper Moderators last edited by wrapper

              I’d be intersted to see your ping, I’ll do it from here for comparison : ping neoscrypt.de

              time=42.0 ms

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • greenuser
                greenuser last edited by greenuser

                Pinging neoscrypt.de [217.160.170.182] with 32 bytes of data:
                Reply from 217.160.170.182: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=54
                Reply from 217.160.170.182: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=54
                Reply from 217.160.170.182: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=54
                Reply from 217.160.170.182: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=54

                Ping statistics for 217.160.170.182:
                Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
                Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
                Minimum = 26ms, Maximum = 27ms, Average = 26ms

                Cornwall to Germany

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Wellenreiter
                  Wellenreiter Moderators last edited by

                  Well neoscrypt.de is not the p2pool host, probably not even in the same data center, as I can see from the IP Address returned.

                  The p2pool node is p2pool.neoscrypt.de (ip 46.4.0.101)

                  Feathercoin development donation address: 6p8u3wtct7uxRGmvWr2xvPxqRzbpbcd82A
                  Openpgp key: 0x385C34E77F0D74D7 (at keyserver.ubuntu.com)/fingerprint: C7B4 E9EA 17E1 3D12 07AB 1FDB 385C 34E7 7F0D 74D7

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • wrapper
                    wrapper Moderators last edited by wrapper

                    @Wellenreiter That was not the point of the analysis, we measured the time from each computer to a common site/point in Germany!

                    The data still told us if the person being supported had a worse connection than me, by linking to the same site. I tried pinging to the actual site first but that seemed blocked.

                    — 46.4.0.101 ping statistics —
                    30 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 29230ms

                    greenuser 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • greenuser
                      greenuser @wrapper last edited by

                      @wrapper
                      My rig failed-over to https://give-me-coins.com at just past midnight last night. I’m looking at it hashing now and have received 30ftc in 12 hours, is that good?
                      651 KH/s for 12 hours with 0% invalid shares.

                      It should have failed back again when http://p2pool.neoscrypt.de:19327/static/ came good.
                      Maybe the software takes the better pool for my settings. p2pool.neoscrypt.de is still my prioraty pool.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • wrapper
                        wrapper Moderators last edited by

                        Your earning seemed OK for the time mining, you loose stratum changing pools though.

                        I had trouble with failing back (on one of my miners), it may be a bug / incompatibility to the particular driver.

                        … which is why I went to my own local p2pool, which is a buffer to connection issues. Local p2pool has been rock stable, no failovers since.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post