The attack is over and we can thank automatic coin choice pools
-
[quote name=“zerodrama” post=“11980” timestamp=“1370823780”]
The attacker isn’t trying to profit.The attacker wants us to reverse.
That will kill FTC because it would hurt legitimate miners and buyers and sellers especially when we are opening the market.
Stop worrying about the attacker making money. They want to waste their money to hurt us and then we’re going to hurt our users?
[/quote]
A million times this.I understand the desire to try and do something to stop the attackers’ supposed profit, but what people have been discussing doing would do far more harm to the reputation of FTC than any harm it would do to the attackers. Yes, 51% attacks are a problem. However, drastic actions will not solve the problem. As zerodrama has said, he is working on ways to combat this. Anyone can put a band-aid on a problem; good solutions take time.
-
solution: keep mining 8)
-
[quote name=“whenhowwho” post=“12064” timestamp=“1370831373”]
if you happen to run the pool that I mine on. First off I love your pool. Second smack yourself. Seriously, high five yourself in the face. I have been paying a fee already and donating some extra if your “hot wallet” could not handle the abuse after all the fees that you have already collected as well as the donations (there are many donators) then you are doing it wrong. We both know that at some point you must have oversold your FTC which is what put you in the situation you are in the first place. Put the fee back to what it was and stop your nonsense.
[/quote]If its the same pool I’m on then it’s to basically get people off the pool.
I too donate. after doing so, found there was no ‘faster’ donor pool anyway, but meh, no biggie. But now it’s about what… a total of 10% to mine there.
Nah, I make less than 20 coins a day at the current difficulty. and with all this shit going on, I have no idea what pools are good, grumpy, bad, or crazy.
as for having multiple pools set up in my miner, that’s like asking me to spread a teaspoon of butter on a dozen loaves of bread and expect it to stick. between 120 confirms or over 20 hours to confirm it’s just not reasonable.
im just going to close my eyes and forget about it, leave it go… sfa else I can do about anything…
-
[quote name=“zerodrama” post=“11919” timestamp=“1370817760”]
Give Me FTC shut off withdrawals. This has effectively killed the attack.Because of the high hashrate the attacker was also overwhelmed by automatic coin choice pools.
The result was that many scrypt miners turned to FTC which snowballed. The attacker still managed to get some coin. But again this shows that a 51% injection and a full attack are different things.
To fully attack you must:
Gain 51% of the mining power.
SUSTAIN the 51% mining power.
Orphan legitimate block generation.
Get people to confirm your blocks.There is a misconception that mining helps the attacker. Yes, it helps the attacker to confirm some of his false coins. BUT, as soon as the rest of the network reaches higher rate than his, the ledger gets reorganized.
This would have been a hell of a lot worse without automatic coin choice pools. They routed a ton of hashpower at FTC. This broke the attacker’s control of the blockchain.
[/quote]On behalf of Multipool, you’re welcome.
But seriously, we did not have the hash rate to match the attackers, even when the multiport switched to FTC.
-
It’s like Oprah here today.
-
[quote name=“Mogumodz” post=“12185” timestamp=“1370841682”]
It’s like Oprah here today.
[/quote]Do we get free gifts? I’ve looked under my chair, but no luck.
-
[quote name=“Tuck Fheman” post=“12186” timestamp=“1370841774”]
[quote author=Mogumodz link=topic=1463.msg12185#msg12185 date=1370841682]
It’s like Oprah here today.
[/quote]Do we get free gifts? I’ve looked under my chair, but no luck.
[/quote]No sorry, attacker took them so we have none :(
-
Attacker(s) took out Coinchoose yesterday as well.
-
Just want to say - I dropped support for FTC after I found out about the block reward - but after this attack - I’d just like to say i want to help in any way possible - obviously FTC is enough of a threat to warrant it - so if there is any way in which we/i can help FTC , i’d like to .
and enemy of an enemy is a friend to me ! :D
who is the main Dev of FTC these days?
-
[quote name=“erk” post=“12281” timestamp=“1370856205”]
Just to make it clear, I don’t believe that the automated coin choice pools had anything to do with the attack, I believe the title of this post is misleading and provocative.[/quote]
I think almost everyone here believe the choice pools are what saved us from a potential worst case scenario. If events didn’t transpire the way they did (FTC becoming so profitable at the same time the attacks took place) we would have had a much bigger mess to clean up. I also understand how you may view the post title as misleading, but the opening post is not misleading whatsoever. -
[quote name=“digitalindustry” post=“12288” timestamp=“1370857261”]
Just want to say - I dropped support for FTC after I found out about the block reward - but after this attack - I’d just like to say i want to help in any way possible - obviously FTC is enough of a threat to warrant it - so if there is any way in which we/i can help FTC , i’d like to .and enemy of an enemy is a friend to me ! :D
who is the main Dev of FTC these days?
[/quote]Good to have you :), the main Dev is Bushstar.
-
[quote name=“erk” post=“12281” timestamp=“1370856205”]
Just to make it clear, I don’t believe that the automated coin choice pools had anything to do with the attack, I believe the title of this post is misleading and provocative.
[/quote]I said automated coin choice pools HELPED us.
For those people who say, “So nothing will be done?”
Reactionary solutions are worse than nothing.
We are doing something. We are innovating to make this much more difficult to carry out.
We are not going to panic and hurt legitimate miners. We will create and improve. Punishment for the guilty is just a crutch that doesn’t solve the problem.The attacker does NOT CARE about punishment. They want the coin to die. There is no deterrent for these people. They have money and bitcoin to burn. They will kill us with brute force or loss of confidence.
They do not care if they lose money.
They do not care if their attack fails.
They want us to lose faith and confidence.
They want us to disappear.The more we react against attacks, instead of preventing them and improving the coin, the weaker we are.
-
I’m from a political socioeconomic background so let me give you guys a little education - :
1. work on sCrypt FPGA or ASIC -
2. Spam out “Alt coins” < that you made and control < to spread the base of the smaller miners while they chase after all the spam.3. concentrate you ASIC or FPGA # power.
4. Attack the weakest at the time with the aim to destroy [b][i]Confidence in the unit and entity [/i][/b]
this all = attack is from people with lots of capital caught up in Bitcoin and ASICS.
there are two parts to the confidence vector , [i][b]Traders Confidence and miners Confidence.[/b][/i]
I think the Devs made the right decision as Trading is the life and death.
I will now mine FTC and I may have never before , so the attack may have blow back as it may bring a lot of attention to FTC , plus FTC is low enough in price that i can significantly benefit anyhow .
it sounds like the idea that was had of many pools with 100MH limits could help?
-
https://www.cryptsy.com/ delisted FTC - says it’s “hidden” in the twitter update
-
[quote name=“Pathosverdes3” post=“12390” timestamp=“1370869360”]
https://www.cryptsy.com/ delisted FTC - says it’s “hidden” in the twitter update
[/quote]This seems to be FUD
-
[quote name=“Taxidermista” post=“12302” timestamp=“1370858330”]
[quote author=zerodrama link=topic=1463.msg12293#msg12293 date=1370857660]
[quote author=erk link=topic=1463.msg12281#msg12281 date=1370856205]
Just to make it clear, I don’t believe that the automated coin choice pools had anything to do with the attack, I believe the title of this post is misleading and provocative.
[/quote]I said automated coin choice pools HELPED us.
[/quote]Again, fourth try: what are those automated choice pools you keep talking about besides multipool.in???
[/quote]He’s referring to people who use coinchoose api to automate the switching of “their” clients to different pools that are standalone coin pools.