Forum Home
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular

    [Dev] NeoScrypt Hardware Comparison Site

    Technical Development
    16
    88
    116575
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • SpartanC001
      SpartanC001 Regular Member last edited by

      Send me a html/jquery/php programming guide while you’re at it :P JK! thanks! i really appreciate your support, i didnt expect it to get so much attention at first lol

      I aim to get the new submissions page complete by mid weekend, and to start work on a login page for administration (to allow confirmations of new submissions etc)

      I didnt get to sleep last night so im gonna crash out on the bed for a few hours, will continue work whatever time im can tomorrow :D

      Syd

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W
        Wolf0 Regular Member last edited by

        Certainly, any CPU’s or GPU’s you have that you could test with?

        Technically GDDR5 is QDR, as it is “Quad Pumped” rather than “Double Pumped”, looked at the wikipedia page to clarify, its got all sorts of bits per pin per clock - no idea what they are but i do know GDDR5 is “Quad Pumped”, hence effective frequency is 4x its actual frequency

        Octa Pumped memory could make things very interesting, we’d have graphics cards with 128GB/s+ memory bandwidth @ 1GHz actual frequency on 128 bit interfaces, never mind 256 / 384 / 512 bit interfaces. lol @ 512 bit 2GHz actual, 16GHz effective… 1TB/s effective data rate O.o


        Anyway…

        Please send me your hardware info and hashrates

        Send me your cards details (manufacturers page is very useful), i shall add a submission page on the site shortly (trying to learn html + php for forms xD) which will make this easier.

        Any overclock info you have applied and fanspeeds/profiles, also write if you are using a custom bios, e.g R9 270X bios on a HD 7870, or other modified bios.

        Temperatures are welcome too, this can show if people are doing something wrong, also list if it is watercooled or not, as this will obviously effect temps

        For proofs:

        • screenshot of your miner software

        • screenshot of EITHER (or both if you’re mining with both CPU and GPU at once like me)

        -CPU-z (if its a cpu)

        -GPU-z with both pages open at once (monitor and info)

        Upload screenshots somewhere and post a link along with your miner config (remove any information you dont wish to share)

        This is so i can add more accurate and detailed info :D

        I will upload an example submission

        But I’m on Linux!

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • SpartanC001
          SpartanC001 Regular Member last edited by

          But I’m on Linux!

          in that case, does linux have any utility to give exact clock rates of gpu/cpu? maybe grep something something | something :P ill have a look see what i can find :D

          i remember using this: lshw -numeric -C display

          when i was trying to debug a graphics related linux server crash, i think it pulls some info, but i will try and find a utility (unless you know one)

          EDIT: this looks promising: http://openhardwaremonitor.org/downloads/ could probably use it to give info of both cpu and gpu :)

          EDIT 2: So long as you can prove the hashrates and actual clockrates for cpu + ram / gpu core + vram, and what card it is (generic model number + specifi model number), i can pull most of the information off the other sites and find/calculate mem datarate/bus width myself, its just easier when i can read it off the screenshot.

          When i get the sites submission page running, i will add in-depth instructions, for both linux/windows, and mac if i can get someone to do that (although… who actually uses a mac to mine on? lol)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Wellenreiter
            Wellenreiter Moderators last edited by

            For AMD cards there is the AMD Catalyst Control Center, which gives information about clock rates and more.

            Not sure if all cards are supported.

            For NVIDIA there is a tool called NVClock, that can set and read clock rates, but I think the latest cards are not supported. (… yet???)

            Feathercoin development donation address: 6p8u3wtct7uxRGmvWr2xvPxqRzbpbcd82A
            Openpgp key: 0x385C34E77F0D74D7 (at keyserver.ubuntu.com)/fingerprint: C7B4 E9EA 17E1 3D12 07AB 1FDB 385C 34E7 7F0D 74D7

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • SpartanC001
              SpartanC001 Regular Member last edited by

              I forgot about CCC for amd in linux, i’ve used nvidia cards in linux before, but never amd ones, perhaps i should try lol, i have a copy of windows XP (32 bits) + a key, would this be very good for amd or nvidia mining with cgminer? (im looking to put together a few cards i have lying around from old pc’s (R7 240 + HD 4870) and maybe shoving in a couple of 5850’s if/when i can get my hands on some :D

              and hell yes! http://php.net/manual/en/language.variables.external.php

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • D
                DutchDK last edited by

                ############### Example Submission ###############

                …

                Here you go, a submission :

                Type: CPU

                Hashrate: 32-34 Kh/s

                Vendor: Intel

                Model: Xeon X5570 x 2

                Est. Power: 95 W (max TDP) x 2

                Miner: cpuminer-neoscrypt

                Proof: http://peecee.dk/uploads/112014/cpu_neoscrypt.png

                cpu_neoscrypt.png

                Type: GPU

                Hashrate: 311.8 Kh/s

                Vendor: Sapphire

                Model: Vapor-X Tri-X Radeon R9-280X OC

                Est. Power: 250 W TDP

                Miner: sgminer 5.1.0-Dev

                Type: GPU

                Hashrate:314.6 Kh/s

                Vendor: ASUS

                Model: Radeon R9-280X DirectCUII Top

                Est. Power: 250 W TDP

                Miner: sgminer 5.1.0-Dev

                Proof for both: http://peecee.dk/uploads/112014/gpu_neoscrypt1.png

                gpu_neoscrypt1.png

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • SpartanC001
                  SpartanC001 Regular Member last edited by

                  Here you go, a submission :

                  Type: CPU

                  Hashrate: 32-34 Kh/s

                  Vendor: Intel

                  Model: Xeon X5570 x 2

                  Est. Power: 95 W (max TDP) x 2

                  Miner: cpuminer-neoscrypt

                  Proof: http://peecee.dk/uploads/112014/cpu_neoscrypt.png

                  Type: GPU

                  Hashrate: 311.8 Kh/s

                  Vendor: Sapphire

                  Model: Vapor-X Tri-X Radeon R9-280X OC

                  Est. Power: 250 W TDP

                  Miner: sgminer 5.1.0-Dev

                  Type: GPU

                  Hashrate:314.6 Kh/s

                  Vendor: ASUS

                  Model: Radeon R9-280X DirectCUII Top

                  Est. Power: 250 W TDP

                  Miner: sgminer 5.1.0-Dev

                  Proof for both: http://peecee.dk/uploads/112014/gpu_neoscrypt1.png

                  took me some time to get through that one! ive entered them now :D

                  thanks for the submission!

                  also, i’ve been trying to get sgminer working on my nvidia cards, but all it does is either crash the gpu driver, or produce endless hardware errors :( any tips?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • D
                    DutchDK last edited by

                    also, i’ve been trying to get sgminer working on my nvidia cards, but all it does is either crash the gpu driver, or produce endless hardware errors :( any tips?

                    Besides buying a couple of AMD cards ? :P

                    Check that OpenCL is functioning on the cards. You need to have an opencl compiler installed, dont know if it is included with the nvidia drivers, or if you need to download a OpenCL SDK/Runtime pack seperately for the Nvidia cards.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • SpartanC001
                      SpartanC001 Regular Member last edited by

                      cgMiner runs fine (and compiles the bin etc), but it only manages a whimpy 34 kh/s on 660ti, and 39 on 770, i know nvidia isnt the best for opencl

                      Ive tried copying the cgminer bin to sgminer but all that does is kill the display driver, no matter what settings i try to use

                      I can tune my 660ti up to 50+ kh/s with it but it just makes hardware errors

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        DutchDK last edited by

                        cgMiner runs fine (and compiles the bin etc), but it only manages a whimpy 34 kh/s on 660ti, and 39 on 770, i know nvidia isnt the best for opencl

                        Ive tried copying the cgminer bin to sgminer but all that does is kill the display driver, no matter what settings i try to use

                        I can tune my 660ti up to 50+ kh/s with it but it just makes hardware errors

                        What happens if you use a pristine install of sgminer 5.1.0-Dev ? Doesn’t it compile a neoscrypt kernel for your nvidia cards ?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • SpartanC001
                          SpartanC001 Regular Member last edited by

                          I will try again, i was trying with Wolf0’s optimized sgminer neoscrypt kernel, or perhaps that one was meant for cgminer?

                          Progress report: the submission form is actually getting a bit of progression!!!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • SpartanC001
                            SpartanC001 Regular Member last edited by

                            ############### Update News ###############

                            The “New Submission” page on the site is now working!

                            You can find it at: http://hw.neoscrypt.tk/new/

                            Please use that instead of posting submissions here!!!

                            ############### Thanks ###############

                            Sydney

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ?
                              A Former User last edited by

                              Spartan, this is awesome! Thank you ahy!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ?
                                A Former User last edited by

                                I’ll pin this in dev for you if that’s ok.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  momo last edited by

                                  Hi all

                                  Proof of my Submission for “Sapphire HD 6570” at http://hw.neoscrypt.tk/new/

                                  proof:https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/53187180/Proof-GPU_HD6570.jpg

                                  “Sapphire HD 6570 OC to HD6670”

                                  proof: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/53187180/Proof-GPU_HD6570_OC_HD6670.jpg

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • D
                                    DutchDK last edited by

                                    Hi all

                                    Proof of my Submission for “Sapphire HD 6570” at http://hw.neoscrypt.tk/new/

                                    proof:https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/53187180/Proof-GPU_HD6570.jpg

                                    You are using the wrong tool to show proof. You are using the GPU Caps Viewer, instead of GPU-Z as requested. GPU-Z shows more info, including the ability to read the sensors on your card.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • S
                                      slowhash Regular Member last edited by

                                      My additions to the neo site comparison. (data already entered on ‘new’ page)

                                      pic 1 shows the reported hashrates (I get these before running GPU-z)

                                      Z44Apfy.jpg?1

                                      pic 2 shows lowered hashrates after running GPU-z and it slows down my hashrate until rebooting!!!

                                      2ztWVHo.jpg?1

                                      pic 3 shows GPU 1 & 2 -XFX R9 290x settings

                                      m408yWc.jpg

                                      pic 4 shows GPU 3 & 4 -Sapphire TRi-x OC R9 290 settings

                                      ooVLBR2.jpg

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • SpartanC001
                                        SpartanC001 Regular Member last edited by

                                        Spartan, this is awesome! Thank you ahy!

                                        Thanks, i’m enjoying making it too, learning php and html as i go along :D

                                        I’ll pin this in dev for you if that’s ok.

                                        That’s awesome thanks!

                                        Hi all

                                        Proof of my Submission for “Sapphire HD 6570” at http://hw.neoscrypt.tk/new/

                                        proof:https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/53187180/Proof-GPU_HD6570.jpg

                                        I’ve accepted your submission on the site, in future try to use GPU-z for proof, as it gives more information :)

                                        You are using the wrong tool to show proof. You are using the GPU Caps Viewer, instead of GPU-Z as requested. GPU-Z shows more info, including the ability to read the sensors on your card.

                                        It’s not too critical now the new submissions page is working, as i can pull most information of other sources (bandwidth/power etc) but it’s easier if people can fill it out themselves (GPU-z gives all the information needed for the fields on the submission page)

                                        For proof all that is needed now is a screenshot of the card name and clockrates, alongwith the miner software showing the hashrate. and please put a link to that in the “notes” section in the submission.

                                        My additions to the neo site comparison. (data already entered on ‘new’ page)

                                        pic 1 shows the reported hashrates (I get these before running GPU-z)

                                        pic 2 shows lowered hashrates after running GPU-z and it slows down my hashrate until rebooting!!!

                                        pic 3 shows GPU 1 & 2 -XFX R9 290x settings

                                        pic 4 shows GPU 3 & 4 -Sapphire TRi-x OC R9 290 settings

                                        Added those now, is the 290 beating the 290x because of the memory type? seems pretty interesting to see how different memory types can effect things alot, perhaps timings have something to do with it.

                                        ############### Important ###############

                                        For proof, please upload your screenshot to any free image hosting site, e.g. http://tinypic.com/ or screenshot sharing site e.g. http://gyazo.com

                                        AND

                                        put this link in the ‘Notes’ section when entering your submission on the new submissions page.

                                        This makes it a whole lot easier to find where peoples proof images are! (i have to check this thread to make sure i havent missed any)

                                        Also: html code can be used in the notes section, to add a link to proof:

                                        [Proof][4]
                                        

                                        Again can i remind everyone the new submission page is working, and can be found at http://hw.neoscrypt.tk/new/

                                        ############### Thanks ###############

                                        Sydney

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M
                                          momo last edited by

                                          You are using the wrong tool to show proof. You are using the GPU Caps Viewer, instead of GPU-Z as requested. GPU-Z shows more info, including the ability to read the sensors on your card.

                                          ok i’ll use it now

                                          thank’s

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • S
                                            slowhash Regular Member last edited by

                                            Added those now, is the 290 beating the 290x because of the memory type? seems pretty interesting to see how different memory types can effect things alot, perhaps timings have something to do with it.

                                            That is correct, they are both bottlenecked by using wolf’s next oldest kernel because I cannot get the latest one running, but the Hynix vs Elpida memory thing is the single factor in the difference in speed, as they are both using settings very close to each other to get those speeds. Which is why I included the memory type.

                                            When the newest kernel is released in a working windows build, those will have to be edited as they should both see a minimum15% increase in speed. 8)

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post