[Dev] NeoScrypt GPU Miner - Public Beta Test
-
where to get the .exe file??
Use your normal exe for Windows. Just download my cl file from GitHub, and replace the cl file that came with your miner. Then, delete any files ending in .bin and start the miner as usual.
-
Use your normal exe for Windows. Just download my cl file from GitHub, and replace the cl file that came with your miner. Then, delete any files ending in .bin and start the miner as usual.
fucking awesome! +35%
-
fucking awesome! +35%
I know; I used some of my own code to fix it - and it happened to require several things fixed.
-
Family forum boys and girls! Curb the language please
UM
-
I know; I used some of my own code to fix it - and it happened to require several things fixed.
some stability issues with your kernel, crashes like in 3-4hours
-
some stability issues with your kernel, crashes like in 3-4hours
Does it happen on reasonably new drivers? I’m on 14.9 and haven’t had it crash yet.
-
Ups, only read the last two messages here after merging Wolf0’s kernel into the master-branch. So master-github is now on 3.7.8 including wolf’s current kernel.
I have tested it on an Nvidia GPU and had no issues, but running only for short periods of time. Let’s monitor that.
-
i have 14.9 drivers, version 14.301.1001.0
-
i have 14.9 drivers, version 14.301.1001.0
All right; give it another go and I’ll leave mine going.
-
i think 14.9 doesnt like my high gpu clocks…
yes, seems it was my only elpida card crashed
so i think this is more related to elpida card on 14.9 than this new kernel( of course elpida will be pushed harder with new kernel with 14.9)
i dropped clocks by 10mhz for now
added 2>logfile.txt to my conf, is it good to log all needed?
-
Can we get a windows compile of the updated miner from Wolf0
-
Can we get a windows compile of the updated miner from Wolf0
- would also like to have one.
-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0
Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.
Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.
-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0
Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.
Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.
Oddly, even on my own in-dev kernel, my 290X at 1125/1600 (memory type unknown) does 250kh/s, while my Hynix 280X does 255kh/s - 265kh/s at 1150/1500… weird.
-
Wow, 255Kh/s with no HW errors? I’m assuming that’s 1 gpu… None of my stuff is OC’d except for my 7950’s (which went from 85kh/s to 113kh/s) …
-
https://www.dropbox.com/s/fc6ufamv44140zl/NeoScrypt-3.7.8.zip?dl=0
Seeing a HUGE performance bump for the R9 290 - 100kh/s - 135-140Kh/s. Using native 14.9 drivers, no messing with 13.x bin files.
Thanks Wolf0 & Vehre… This is awesome.
Awesome thanks, up to 150kh/s now on R9 280x.
-
Wow, 255Kh/s with no HW errors? I’m assuming that’s 1 gpu… None of my stuff is OC’d except for my 7950’s (which went from 85kh/s to 113kh/s) …
Yes, it’s one card; it wouldn’t be worth mentioning if it had HW errors, lol.
On my in-dev kernel, I have a 7950 at 1175/1600 and solidly over 210kh/s.
-
Yes, it’s one card; it wouldn’t be worth mentioning if it had HW errors, lol.
On my in-dev kernel, I have a 7950 at 1175/1600 and solidly over 210kh/s.
Weird I cant seem to replicate at all, 140 max on 280x and 160 on 290
-
So how do we get a copy of this in-dev kernel? LoL
-
Weird I cant seem to replicate at all, 140 max on 280x and 160 on 290
Yes, I know you can’t - because it’s a half-rewritten kernel that I’m using. Not the 14.9 fixed one.
