Pinning can be done by clicking “more reply options”, then on the right inside the drop down “After Posting”, you can change it from do nothing to “Pin this Topic”

With that said, I have re-pinned it.

There’s a lot all ready pinned in the tech dev subforum, but am I the only one who thinks this could also be worth pinning?

I have been thinking the same thing. This is what I have found :https://github.com/buttercoin/buttercoin. O0

Thank you , I think it is a good choice :D

Dogecoin fork event , We need to be vigilant. They were hit with an NTP DDoS Amplification attack!

New web site : Enhancements Bugs

Issue: There is no way back from the forum, the Feathercoin Button should do that, but returns to forum.

Note, we need the Github set up for webSite issues, and once we are up and running, I will replace this thread [Development] Thread with a pinned web site “Support thread.”

FYI, bitcoinsharp hasn’t seen any commits since fall 2011, so it’s pretty much useless.

I love this. 8)

Got it, and I understand the desire for deniability.

I guess my bigger complaint then is the fact it is all “hidden” (“transparent” is probably the marketing term for it ;-) from the user who owns the wallet. No way to know what key-pairs are storing your coins unless you go fiddling with the chain and debug window. Doesn’t seem very user friendly for more advanced users.

No, it has no relation with MtGox but have relation due to “issue” of malleable transactions and it’s possible impact on services that operate with 0 confirmations transactions that use incoming transaction id as identification of the payment or play round. I had that issue in my code and fix it. Press release of MtGox and all the responses from bitcoin dev. community just give all of us valuable lesson about implementation of bitcoin protocol based payment systems :)

I love it!

Been developing/programming for about 20 years.

[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“58306” timestamp=“1392072391”]
[quote author=estrabd link=topic=7464.msg57736#msg57736 date=1391776994]
Maybe I should have been more clear. There is a place where one can place arbitrary data - it’s some number of bytes. I’m interested in learning more about putting data there - arbitrary data that is no larger than that section. Can the client read/write to this section when it initiates a transaction? If so, how?

Thank you,
[/quote]

Yep. The LINK protocol explains how to do this very neatly, and provides a standard way of going about it so that the data can be easily read and parsed by any client, but you can always skip the LINK encoding scheme and make your own: https://github.com/tsavo/link
[/quote]

Most appreciated.++

Thanks guys. It’s coming along.

Thanks for the tips mog.

As always, if you have any thoughts, tips, or requests just let me know.

[quote name=“Kevlar” post=“57963” timestamp=“1391882094”]
Brilliant article by one of the guys from Ethereum: http://bitcoinmagazine.com/10055/cryptographic-code-obfuscation-decentralized-autonomous-organizations-huge-leap-forward/

This is yet another game changer. We live in the most exciting time to be alive… ever.
[/quote]

Yeah, there is something in the air. We’re starting to see the next gen coins/apps now and it all started with Link (well, that’s our story). ;)

I’ve been impressed with some of the coins that have come out in 2014 or just before … like NXT, Ethereum (coming soon), Gridcoin, Vertcoin etc. They are trying different things and whether or not they succeed is not that important to me at this point. The fact that they are trying something new and expanding others thoughts on the possibilities is what’s inspiring and worth investing my time.

There are so many apps/ideas on the horizon that we’re only hearing tidbits about now. I can’t wait!

I’ve always felt there will be another coin that will come out and be accepted as “the peoples coin” (that won’t be regulated to death by governments). I’d hoped FTC would be that coin, but for various reasons that didn’t happen. I think it could have and still can, but [i]something[/i] will have to change to shake things up.

What really pisses me off about this scene is the fact that these “investors” will decry FTC for “instamining”, yet coins like Maxcoin have monumentally failed launches, no GUI client, no pools and on and on and yet still millions of people support that crap coin with crap devs and drove the price over $30 and it’s still around $3.50-$4.00 and will rise with every episode of Max Keiser Report.

But yeah, exciting times! lulz

Thanks Chris! :D

One reason I jumped on ftc early on was that the btc blockchain was so large that I just killed it. Even litecoin takes forever. I’d like for ftc to have that size blockchain, but it seems that something must be done so that such an upfront hit is not required.

(semi-related) I don’t ever see any discussions about how unfeasible it is for everyone to be throwing around this ever grown file, but it seems it could become an achilles heal for p2p CCs unless there’s an easier way to decentralize the blockchain itself.

That’s fine. I understand what you say.

I personally still see this as a priority. Keep up the brainstorming guys.

Looks like the guy in your post used a line from a book which was an easy match for a bot.
I think if I come up with a good passphrase code combination this could be a real winner.

No one replied to this? I’m curious what people think about Kimoto’s Gravity Well also. FTC mentioned in that context here:

http://www.reddit.com/r/dogecoin/comments/1wc0sr/why_arent_we_discussing_implementing_kimotos/